Slashdot Log In
Google Offers Hybrid Satellite and Map View
Posted by
Zonk
on Fri Jul 22, 2005 09:56 PM
from the best-of-both-worlds dept.
from the best-of-both-worlds dept.
That's Unpossible! writes "Google Maps now offers a hybrid view which combines their map view with their satellite view. The Google blog has a notice on the update. It appears to use 8-bit alpha transparent PNGs to make it work."
This discussion has been archived.
No new comments can be posted.
Google Offers Hybrid Satellite and Map View
|
Log In/Create an Account
| Top
| 298 comments
(Spill at 50!) | Index Only
| Search Discussion
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
I wonder ... (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:I wonder ... (Score:4, Funny)
(Last Journal: Tuesday July 26 2005, @07:33PM)
Nice (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:Nice (Score:5, Interesting)
here's a cool view of a place where the map is newer than the sattelite picture. you can see where rt 36 extends to the west over washington street. but in the pure sattellite picture, you can only see the construction. this is a realitively new bypass, so the sattellite doesn't have it in, but the map is updated perfectlly. http://maps.google.com/maps?q=westminster,+co&ll=
Re:Nice (Score:5, Informative)
I too wonder where they get their data. I was looking at a couple of mapping apps a few weeks ago, playing with a GPS puck I got for my birthday, and I think one of those shows the same stupid mistakes in the streets. It was either Microsoft Streets and Trips, or it was Rand McNally Streetfinder. I don't remember which, and right now I don't have either loaded because my disk drive died...
The satellite view shows my pool, though, so - Hey!! I can see my pool from space!!
Re:As good as this looks... (Score:4, Insightful)
(http://forechecker.blogspot.com/ | Last Journal: Friday September 07, @08:16PM)
Re:Hmm... (Score:4, Informative)
Re:Hmm... (Score:5, Interesting)
Maybe they're there already - it's not implausible that they could release something that doesn't work properly with existing versions of IE, along with an explanatory note to upgrade to a working browser.
If they put in a direct link to Firefox say, the takeup could be huge, dwarfing the installed base to date. All of us here may know about all the alternative browsers, but your average joe doesn't - but if Google were to start pushing people towards them... now *that* would be news.
Not entirely new (Score:5, Informative)
(http://www.civilwarflorida.com/)
Scale! (Score:5, Informative)
Poor Guy... (Score:5, Funny)
(http://homepage.mac.com/fahrenba)
BUT (Score:4, Insightful)
(http://www.morpheussoftware.net/)
Still NO EXIT NUMBERS!
I can't believe I still use Mapquest's tiny and slow interface just to find freeway exit numbers.
Re:Scale! (Score:5, Informative)
I guess it is actually odd, though, because the rectangle covers the same area at all times. Interesting.
This'll come in handy... (Score:5, Funny)
(Last Journal: Friday May 06 2005, @02:21PM)
Scaled as well (Score:5, Informative)
(http://pe.ter.dk/)
Unfortunately there still isn't maps available for Europe besides England. I hope it would arrive soon.
Re:Scaled as well (Score:5, Informative)
(http://mike.eire.ca/)
PNG support in IE (Score:5, Informative)
(http://www.twinhelix.com/)
MSIE (as of v6) doesn't support 32 bit transparent PNGs natively, but there is a cool hack [kevinfreitas.net] where you can dither them down to 8 bits, retaining translucenct for browsers that support it, and using 1-bit transparency in MSIE, so it still looks OK.
Alternatively, you can use the AlphaImageLoader() filter for near native IE PNG support [twinhelix.com] -- that's a link to my own free CSS behavior that automatically adds IMG and background-image support for PNGs to MSIE 5.5+.
Either way, PNGs rock, except for the lack of a cross-platform gamma standard -- if you need to match other colours on your site, just use JPEGs/GIFs.
About time! (Score:4, Interesting)
(http://monogon.org/)
Now if our ZIP codes resolved to a single address, we would be set. ZIP+4 helps, but it's still not there yet. UK postcodes, while not perfect, are much better in this regard.
I guess "regular" maps can now be officially (Score:3, Insightful)
(http://slashdot.org/)
Very Impressive (Score:4, Insightful)
The fact you can zoom in, to the highest zoom level, anywhere in the US... and the roads line up with the satellite maps.. is amazing.
I just zoomed in fully to my street on Long Island, NY, and the road names and highways were overlayed perfectly with the actual streets as depicted on the satellite map.
How do they do this? I guess the satellite maps are labelled so precisely that they can overlay lat/lon routes on top of them?
WTF is up with you people? (Score:3, Insightful)
(Last Journal: Monday January 06 2003, @10:36PM)
Geez! If they put pictures of fancy roses in corner you'd be creaming yourselves!
This guy did it earlier... (Score:5, Informative)
(http://slashdot.org/~GillBates0 | Last Journal: Tuesday July 10, @04:36PM)
And I find his GUI better than Google's. It's slicker, and the ability to adjust the transparency (slider at the bottom) is quite innovative. As is also the ability to move the foreground or background and have the other align itself accordingly.
Re:It has to be said. (Score:4, Insightful)
(http://brett.jungblut.net/)
Re:It has to be said. (Score:4, Insightful)
(http://naikrovek.org/)
and about the address parsing: it isn't sure it can accurately guess what you want, so it prompts you. would you rather it guess incorrectly or prompt? I'll pick prompt, thanks.
nothing has to be said.
Re:It has to be said. (Score:4, Insightful)
(Last Journal: Sunday November 06 2005, @02:43AM)
They will create services which will survive for YEARS! Slow ad revenue is just a stumbling block towards total domination.
If they can just keep generating 5c a click for 50 years they'll generate billions!
Plus they have froogle which promises to be the biggest cash cow the internet has ever seen.
Re:It has to be said. (Score:5, Insightful)
(http://www.krunk4ever.com/)
in my opinion, beta is just a term google likes to fool the public with. if something is truly beta, you have 'beta' testers which usually are a select group to test out the product before releasing to the general public. this is usually a process to find bugs and etc. google has made the ENTIRE WORLD their beta testers, which i don't really mind, but final question that i want to ask you is how is sticking the word 'beta' or removing it from their products going to be any difference to you.
i can see why you'd complain if it wasn't release to the general public, while beta users reaped all the usefulness. sorta like how people felt when only a select few got 1gb gmail accounts. gmail was in beta, and people were fighting to get accounts paying over $50 for 1 account. i could see why you'd want to see gmail go outta beta just for that reason. but google maps doesn't require subscription fees, no one has exclusive access, and it works beautifully.
in fact, as someone else mention, google beta products are AD free!
Zoom support (Score:3, Insightful)
(http://www.cmason.com/)
IE supported as well (transparent PNG) (Score:4, Informative)
(http://pe.ter.dk/)
There are a couple of different methods. The Google Maps API mentions one:
http://www.google.com/apis/maps/documentation/#XH